@article{oai:sapporo-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:00004818,
 author = {後藤, 善久 and ゴトウ, ヨシヒサ and Goto, Yoshihisa},
 journal = {札幌大学女子短期大学部紀要<サッポロ ダイガク ジョシ タンキ ダイガクブ キヨウ>. -- (AN00074536)1号 (昭58.2)-, = 通巻21号 (昭58.2)-. -- 札幌 : 札幌大学, 1983.2-  注記: "Sapporo University Women's Junior College journal"のタイトル  の種類変更: 裏表紙タイトル(-32・33合併号 (平10.11))→並列タイトル(No  . 34 (1999.9)-) ; 表紙の責任表示"札幌大学"は32・33合併号 (平10.11)ま  で ; 奥付に表示の編集者: 札幌大学女子短期大学部紀要委員 (-32・33合併  号 (平10.11)) ; 大きさ変更: 26cm (-32・33合併号 (平10.11))→21cm (No  . 34 (1999.9)-) ; 出版者: 札幌大学女子短期大学部 (<No. 34 (1999.9)>-  )  ISSN: 02888211  別タイトル: Sapporo University Women's Junior College journal  継続前誌: <a href = "/cgi-bin/shsproc?id=AA11395336">札幌大学教養部女子短期大学部紀要. [B]},
 month = {Sep},
 note = {P, In Chomsky and Lasnik (1993) and Martin (1996), it is argued that PRO has null Case. Though the arguments that PRO has Case and that the distribution of PRO depends on temporal properties of non-finite Tense are appealing, the analysis of PRO which relies on null Case is not convincing since there is some doubt as to the existence of null Case. In this paper, I argue against the theory of null Case based on Icelandic control infinitives. Arguing that PRO has nominative Case, I show that the distribution of PRO can be accounted for in terms of Agree, proposed in Chomsky (1998, 1999)},
 pages = {59--71},
 title = {PRO and Agree},
 volume = {40},
 year = {2002}
}